This project has very strong strengths in the design process, regression to find the origin of the site and sequential application of all these steps as a design process💓 In particular, this project showed a creative solution that interpreted the relationship between the old and new as the site and described visitors as the ebb and flow, so it was a great idea of how people and the site should meet😊

However, it was a wonder that the relationship between ‘new urban development-IOC building-car access’ should be maintained in a straight line🤔 If we had the interpretation of the memory and traces of the IOC building that this site has already, there could have been offered a more open architectural solution⭐Also, the relationship between the IOC building and the museum is meeting on the ground🤝 If it is explained by what kind of ‘hierarchy’ they meet between the site for the new museum and the IOC building, our project level could have been raised even higher👍 Lastly, it is a shame the cross-sectional expression📐 If the process of finding the origin of the site is connected to the cross-sectional plan, it will be able to clearly recognize the concept we want to convey.👍This could have been explained at the same time as the validity of the material selection of the project🌳

I wish the project could have been improved with more time, but it was a good project in which the strength to find the design direction from the site origin and lead it to the overall design stood out🍎 Through this opportunity, I confirmed our ability to carry out the international competition-level project, and we will be able to complete a more high-level project next time⭐